![]() The phrase also indicates the ease of computer cross-dressing: representing oneself as of a different gender age race social, cultural, or economic class, etc. The phrase may be taken "to mean that cyberspace will be liberatory because gender, race, age, looks, or even 'dogness' are potentially absent or alternatively fabricated or exaggerated with unchecked creative license for a multitude of purposes both legal and illegal", an understanding that echoed statements made in 1996 by John Gilmore, a key figure in the history of Usenet. ![]() ![]() Ī study by Morahan-Martin and Schumacher (2000) on compulsive or troublesome Internet use discusses this phenomenon, suggesting the ability to represent one's self behind the mask of a computer screen may be part of the compulsion to go online. Although a local access point in, for example, a university may require identity confirmation, it holds such information privately, without embedding it in external Internet transactions. Lawrence Lessig suggests that "no one knows" because Internet protocols require no user to confirm their own identity. The cartoon conveys an understanding of Internet privacy that implies the ability to send and receive messages - or to create and maintain a website - behind a mask of anonymity. They don't hear your accent and make assumptions. They don't look at your body and make assumptions. You don't have to worry about the slots other people put you in as much. You can completely redefine yourself if you want. Sociologist Sherry Turkle elaborates: "You can be whoever you want to be. The cartoon symbolizes the liberation of one's Internet presence from popular prejudices. Īccording to Bob Mankoff, then The New Yorker 's cartoon editor, "The cartoon resonated with our wariness about the facile façade that could be thrown up by anyone with a rudimentary knowledge of html." Implications Lotus Software founder and early Internet activist Mitch Kapor commented in a Time magazine article in 1993 that "the true sign that popular interest has reached critical mass came this summer when the New Yorker printed a cartoon showing two computer-savvy canines". Once the exclusive domain of government engineers and academics, the Internet was by then becoming a subject of discussion in such general interest magazines as The New Yorker. The cartoon marks a notable moment in the history of the Internet. ![]() He drew the cartoon only in the manner of a "make-up-a-caption" item, to which he recalled attaching no "profound" meaning, that it had received little attention initially, but that he felt as if he had created the " smiley face" when his cartoon took on a life of its own, and "can't quite fathom that it's that widely known and recognized". It soon found its away elsewhere, and eventually showed up in an animated Adult Swim bumper on which Green collaborated.Peter Steiner, a cartoonist and contributor to The New Yorker since 1979, has said that although he did have an online account in 1993, he had felt no particular interest in the Internet then. In his conversation with Plante, Green says he first noticed it in the wild “somewhere on Twitter or Facebook” where it had been deployed in the service of complaining about final exams. The GOP did not respond to a request for comment about how it sourced the image, but it’s likely that someone from the party found it elsewhere on the internet much later. The scholars of internet culture at Know Your Meme trace the image’s spread back to September 2014, when it first appeared without attribution and accompanied by the caption “Basically how I’m handling life right now” on Reddit and Imgur. As the Verge’s Chris Plante observes in his introduction to an interview with Green, “This is fine does not mean this is fine-not on social media.” The meme’s influence is so pervasive that it may have changed the meaning of its eponymous phrase. There’s still the feeling here that the world is falling apart, but without the fuller context, it’s the dog’s cool demeanor-somewhere between bemused acceptance and outright denial-that stands out. Isolating the first two panels, however, removes some of the full comic’s bleaker implications.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
Details
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |